Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD 2014 00105
Original file (FD 2014 00105.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


AIR FORCE DJSCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD


NAM £ OF SERV ICE: MEMBER (LAST, FIRST 1\1101)1.£ IN ITIA L)



PERSONAL APPEARANCE

GRA OF.



x        RECORD REVIEW

AFSNISSAN


vr.s     (b{p) (6)
x        (f\)
ADDR ESS AND OR ORGANI ZATION OF COUNSEL
(b) (6)

VOTEOFTHE BOARD

MEM BER SITTING

ll ON    GEN      UOTl lC'
OTHER    OF.NV
x x x x
x


tSSl11- s

A94.0S

INO£X NUMBER
A67.90
EXHIBITSSUB'.1111TED TO TllE llOARI>
I ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
2 APPLICAT ION FOR RlcV lf W Of DISC'l lARGE
3 L El rER OF NOllFICA llON
4 13RIH OF PERSON\11:1. Fll.E
( OUNSl:L'S RELEASE I0TlIE BOARD
AL>lJI IIONAL l:XHIBIrs SUl3MI In:u Ar 1 IMl:01· PERSONAi. APPl:ARANC'E
T1\PI:RECORDING OF PERSONAL /\PPEAR ,\NC'E IIEARING


l l EA RI NG OXI E       C \ SE Nl',\IBER

15 Oct 2014      FD-2014-00105
APPLICA»T 'S ISSUE AJ'o.D nu;. 00,.\RD'S DECISIONAL RATIONALEARE DISC'USSED ON Tiii!ATTA(' IU:o AtR FORCE DISCllARCE REVIEW BOARD DECISIOti-:AL RATIONALG.

Case heard i n Washington, D.C.

Advise appl icant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to su bm it an application to the A FBCM R.

Na mes and votes will be made available to t he applicani at the applicant's request.












TO:




S1\F/MRBR
550 C STREET WES.I .SUITE 40 RANDO LI' II AFB, 1 X 78 I 50-4742

INUURSl\MENT




FROM:

OAT£: 10/2?120 14

SECRETAR\ or nu:AIR FORCE PERSONNE i.COUNCI L AIR FORCF l)IS('llARCf. RE\l'.W SO,\ RO
l!\1:' COl\IANO l.>A:,f.E WING. 3 0 f'L.OOR
,\Nl>RtWS .WS.10 20761-7001


AFHQ FORM 0-2077,JAN 00
(EF-V2)  Previous






AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATJONALE
CASE NUM BER

FD-2014-00105

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for an upgrade of discharge, change to the narrative reason, and to change the reenl istment code.

The appl icant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (ORB) but decl ined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contai ns available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FIN DI NG : The Board denies the upgrade of the d ischarge, change of na1Tati ve reason, and change of reenlistment code.

ISSU E: A pp l icant received a General discharge for Misconduct Cond uct Prejudicial to Good order and Disci pl i ne

The Air Force Discharge Review Board, under i ts responsi bi lity to examine the propriety and equity of an Appl icant's discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warran ted. I n reviewi ng discharges, the Board presu mes regu larity in the conduct of governmenta l affairs unless there i s substantia l credible evidence to rebut the presum ption, to include evidence submitted by the appl icant. The Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to the discharge and the discharge process to ensure the discharge met the perti nent standards of equity and propriety. The record s ind icat ed the applicant recei ved two Article I Ss, one Vacation, six Letters of Reprimand, one Letter of Admonishment. and one Record of Counsel. His miscond uct incl uded failure to go to duty on time (7x), operation of a motor vehicle with expired tags, failure of dorm room inspection, and under false pretense gained access to court systems financia l accounts to pay for internet porn.

A ppl icant contends discharge was ineq uitable because i t was too harsh. The ORB opined that through administra t i ve actions, the applicant had ample opportuni ties to change his negati ve behavior. The Board concl uded that the negative aspects of the appl icant's service outweighed the positive contributions he made i n h i s Ai r Force career. The Board found no issues of equ ity or propriety of the discharge. The characterizat ion of the d ischarge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate

A discha rge is upgraded only if the applicant and the Board can establ ish that an inequity or im propriety took place at the t ime of discharge. After a thorough review of the record , the Board found no evidence to justify an u pgrade of the discharge, narrative reason or re-enlistment code.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedura l and substanti ve requirements of the discharge regu lat ion and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and the applicant was provided full administrati ve due process.

In view of the foregoing findi ngs, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equ itable basis for upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remai n unchanged.

A ttachment:
Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00105

    Original file (FD-2014-00105.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforanupgradeofdischarge, changetothenarrative reason, andtochangethereenlistmentcode. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdecl inedandrequeststhatthe reviewbe completedbasedonthe availableservicerecord. The attachedbriefcontains availablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleading tothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD 2014 00214

    Original file (FD 2014 00214.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeof dischargetohonorable TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailable pertinentdataonthe applicantandthe factorslead ingtothe discharge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00214

    Original file (FD-2014-00214.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeof dischargetohonorable TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailable pertinentdataonthe applicantandthe factorslead ingtothe discharge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00101

    Original file (FD-2014-00101.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeof dischargetohonorable.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdecl inedand requeststhatthereview becompletedbasedonthe availableservicerecord.The attachedbriercontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.FINDING:TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthed ischarge.ISSUE: ApplicantreceivedaGeneraldischargefor Misconduct -Minor Discipl inary Infractions.TheAirForceDischarge ReviewBoard,underi ts...

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD 2014 00101

    Original file (FD 2014 00101.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeof dischargetohonorable.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdecl inedand requeststhatthereview becompletedbasedonthe availableservicerecord.The attachedbriercontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.FINDING:TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthed ischarge.ISSUE: ApplicantreceivedaGeneraldischargefor Misconduct -Minor Discipl inary Infractions.TheAirForceDischarge ReviewBoard,underi ts...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00432

    Original file (FD-2014-00432.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theappl icant appealsforupgradeofdischargeto Honorable. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard (ORB)butdecl inedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedonthe available service record.Theattachedbrief contains availablepertinentdataontheappl icant andthefactorsleadingto the discharge. FINDING: The Board deniestheupgradeofthedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2013-00719

    Original file (FD-2013-00719.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: The applicantappealsforupgradeof discharge toHonorable.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard(ORB)butdeclined and requeststhatthe review becompletedbasedonthe availableservicerecord.The attachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataon theapplicantandthefactors leadingtothe discharge.ISSUE: The applicantreceiveda BadConductDischargeviaSpecialCourtMartial.The AirForceDischarge ReviewBoard,underitsresponsibilitytoexaminetheproprietyand equi...

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD 2014 00391

    Original file (FD 2014 00391.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsfor upgradeofdischargetohonorable. TheapplicantappearedandtestifiedbeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB),withoutcounsel, viavideoteleconferencebetweenAndrewsAFBMarylandandTravisAFB,CAonSeptember22.2014. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdata onthe applicantandthe factorsleadingtothe discharge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00391

    Original file (FD-2014-00391.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsfor upgradeofdischargetohonorable. TheapplicantappearedandtestifiedbeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB),withoutcounsel, viavideoteleconferencebetweenAndrewsAFBMarylandandTravisAFB,CAonSeptember22.2014. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdata onthe applicantandthe factorsleadingtothe discharge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00666

    Original file (FD-2014-00666.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERA L: Theapplicant appeals foranupgradeofthedischarge to Honorable;a changetothereasonand authorityforthedischargeandtochangethere-enlistmentcode.TheapplicantappearedandtestifiedbeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard DRB,withcounsel,atAndrewsAFBonMarch 10, 2015. The followingwitnessalsotestifiedontheapplicant'sbehalf:(wife)(b) (6)Thefollowingadditionalexhibits weresubmittedatthe hearing:Exhibit #4: Applicant'sContentionsExhibit#5:CharacterreferencelettersThe...